Should We Respond Correctly to Our Reasons?

Episteme (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It has been argued that rationality consists in responding correctly to reasons. Recent defenses of the normativity of rationality assume that this implies that we always ought to be rational. However, this follows only if the reasons rationality requires us to correctly respond to are normative reasons. Recent meta-epistemological contributions have questioned whether epistemic reasons are normative. If they were right, then epistemic rationality wouldn’t provide us with normative reasons independently of wrong-kind reasons to be epistemically rational. This paper spells out this neglected challenge for the normativity of epistemic rationality by connecting the two bodies of literature. Moreover, it generalizes this challenge to the rationality of desire, intention, and emotion. The upshot is that we can only answer the normative question about rationality if we debate about blame and accountability for holding different kinds of irrational attitudes, as well as about the sources of mental normativity.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Rationality Consist in Responding Correctly to Reasons?John Broome - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):349-374.
The independence of (in)coherence.Wooram Lee - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6563-6584.
The Importance of Being Rational.Errol Lord - 2018 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rationality versus Normativity.John Broome - 2020 - Australasian Philosophical Review 4 (4):293-311.
Comments on Broome’s ‘Rationality versus Normativity’.Krister Bykvist - 2020 - Australasian Philosophical Review 4 (4):353-360.
The Importance of Being Rational.Errol Lord - 2013 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Being More Realistic About Reasons: On Rationality and Reasons Perspectivism.Clayton Littlejohn - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (3):605-627.
Responding to Second-Order Reasons.Sophie Keeling - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.


Added to PP

99 (#178,800)

6 months
99 (#48,034)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sebastian Schmidt
University of Zürich

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references