Authors
Daniel Schwartz
University of California, San Diego
Abstract
ABSTRACTRevisionists about Aquinas’ teaching on private self-defence take the standard reading to hold that Aquinas applies a version of the Doctrine of Double Effect according to which the intentional killing of a wrongful attacker by a private person is morally prohibited while the non-intentional but foreseeable killing of the attacker is permitted. Revisionists dispute this reading and argue that Aquinas permits the intentional killing of wrongful attackers. I argue that revisionists mischaracterize the standard reading of Aquinas. I consider one of its main proponents, Antonio de Córdoba. When Córdoba condemned the intentional killing of wrongful attackers by private persons, he was not applying DDE. Rather, he was arguing that when you decide to kill an attacker you treat the attacker as a resource for the private end of saving your life. Killing a member of your community is a form of irrevocable social exclusion. This decision ought to be left to the public authorities. The disagreement between the authors defending the standard view and their critics was not about DDE but rather about the moral limits that membership in a community sets on the pursuit of private ends, including the private end of staying alive.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2018.1494542
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,855
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Intention and Permissibility, I.T. M. Scanlon - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):301–317.
Intention and Permissibility.T. M. Scanlon & Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes( 74:301-338.
Intention and Permissibility.T. M. Scanlon & Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74:301-338.
Intention and Permissibility, I.T. Scanlon - 2000 - Supplement to the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74 (1):301-317.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Thomas Aquinas.[author unknown] - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Thomas Aquinas.Christopher M. Brown - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Thomas Aquinas.Christopher M. Brown - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aquinas, Double-Effect Reasoning, and the Pauline Principle.Bernard G. Prusak - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):505-520.
Aquinas and the Unity of Christ: A Defence of Compositionalism. [REVIEW]Jonathan Hill - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):117-135.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-30

Total views
31 ( #316,868 of 2,342,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #332,871 of 2,342,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes