Truth and expressive completeness

In Reading Brandom (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Robert Brandom claims that the theory of meaning he presents in Making It Explicit is expressively complete—i.e., it successfully applies to the language in which the theory of meaning is formulated. He also endorses a broadly Kripkean approach to the liar paradox. I show that these two commitments are incompatible, and I survey several options for resolving the problem.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-20

Downloads
74 (#161,723)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Scharp
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references