Research Ethics 7 (4):120-131 (2011)
AbstractFor decades, scholars in the social sciences and humanities have questioned the appropriateness and utility of prior review of their research by human subjects' ethics committees. This essay seeks to organize thematically some of their published complaints and to serve as a brief restatement of the major critiques of ethics review. In particular, it argues that 1) ethics committees impose silly restrictions, 2) ethics review is a solution in search of a problem, 3) ethics committees lack expertise, 4) ethics committees apply inappropriate principles, 5) ethics review harms the innocent, and 6) better options exist
Similar books and articles
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Experimental Design: Ethics, Integrity and the Scientific Method.Jonathan Lewis - 2020 - In Ron Iphofen (ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Cham, Switzerland: pp. 459-474.
Ethics Review of Big Data Research: What Should Stay and What Should Be Reformed?Effy Vayena, Minerva Rivas Velarde, Mahsa Shabani, Gabrielle Samuel, Camille Nebeker, S. Matthew Liao, Peter Kleist, Walter Karlen, Jeff Kahn, Phoebe Friesen, Bobbie Farsides, Edward S. Dove, Alessandro Blasimme, Mark Sheehan, Marcello Ienca & Agata Ferretti - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-13.
Providing Ethical Guidance for Collaborative Research in Developing Countries.Nina Morris - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (4):211-235.
Between the Accountable and the Auditable: Ethics and Ethical Governance in the Social sciencesSchragZachary M, Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. USA: Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.StarkLaura, Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Van den HoonaardWill C, The Seduction of Ethics: Transforming the Social Sciences. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2011.1. [REVIEW]Nathan Emmerich - 2013 - Research Ethics 9 (4):175-186.
Ethical Dilemmas in Research in Relation to Ethical Review: An Empirical Study.Gunnel Colnerud - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (4):238-253.
References found in this work
Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009.[author unknown] - 2010
Research Ethics Committees: Differences and Moral Judgement.Sarah J. L. Edwards, Richard Ashcroft & Simon Kirchin - 2004 - Bioethics 18 (5):408–427.
The Seduction of Ethics: Transforming the Social Sciences.[author unknown] - 2011
Streamlining Ethical Review.J. Millum & J. Menikoff - 2010 - Annals of Internal Medicine 153 (10):655-72.
The IRB Paradox: Could the Protectors Also Encourage Deceit?Patricia Keith-Spiegel & Gerald P. Koocher - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (4):339 – 349.