Philosophy Today 64 (1):221-238 (2020)

Authors
Norman Schultz
Duquesne University (PhD)
Abstract
The so-called Menschenpark-debate on genetic engineering—originating in 1999—turned out to be one of the most controversial and contentious debates in German philosophy. It is also regarded as the first manifestation of the struggle between Sloterdijk and Habermas. While Sloterdijk’s ideas had a significant impact on Habermas’s theory, Sloterdijk’s philosophy has been consistently ignored and dismissed until today due to two reasons. First, he was accused of advocating for fascist ideology. Second, philosophers from the same academic circles claimed that his method does not meet academic standards. The debate therefore signifies a larger problem that concerns the methodological difference between analytic-Continental philosophies that work on a formal level and Continental philosophies that work with a tropological account experimenting with different non-formal philosophical expressions. I will carve out this distinction with respect to the Menschenpark-debate to argue that Sloterdijk is an integral part of our philosophical historical moment.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  Continental Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtoday2020413329
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,385
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Coming-to-the-World of the Human Animal.Marie-Eve Morin - 2011 - In Stuart Elden (ed.), Sloterdijk Now. Polity. pp. 77-95.
Transhuman Education? Sloterdijk's Reading of Heidegger's Letter on Humanism.Long Fiachra - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (1):177-192.
Are There Any Rules?Timothy Endicott - 2001 - The Journal of Ethics 5 (3):199-219.
De utopie Van Peter Sloterdijk: 'Regels voor het mensenpark'.Hans Achterhuis - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (3):451 - 478.
Krytyka, satyra, sarkazm. Karnawał Petera Sloterdijka.Szymon Wróbel - 2012 - Kronos - metafizyka, kultura, religia 3 (22).
The Saint and the Cynic: Resentment and Jewishness in Améry, Sloterdijk, and Wyschogrod.Menachem Feuer - 2016 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 24 (3):95-116.
New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-04-16

Total views
10 ( #825,151 of 2,367,994 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #160,272 of 2,367,994 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes