The Difference Between Moral and Rational “Oughts”: An Expressivist Account

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):159-174 (2012)

Authors
Peter Schulte
Bielefeld University
Abstract
Morality and rationality are both normative: the moral claim “you ought to help others” is a genuine normative judgment, as well as the rational maxim “you ought to brush your teeth twice a day”. But it seems that there is a crucial difference these two judgments. In the first part of this paper, I argue that this difference is to be understood as a difference between two kinds of normativity: demanding and recommending normativity. But the crucial task is, of course, to explain the difference. In the second part of this paper, I suggest that metaethical expressivists can provide a good explanation: by extending the analysis of ordinary (non-normative) demands and recommendations to normative judgments, they can formulate a convincing account that captures the key differences between morality and rationality
Keywords Metaethics  Normativity  Expressivism  Moral judgments  Rationality  Speech acts
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-011-9276-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,692
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thinking How to Live.Allan Gibbard - 2003 - Harvard University Press.
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Center for the Study of Language and Information.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Expressivists Tell the Difference Between Beauty and Moral Goodness?James Harold - 2008 - American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):289-300.
Two Accounts of the Normativity of Rationality.Jonathan Way - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (1):1-9.
Foucault and the Politics of Difference.Brian T. Trainor - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (5):563-580.
Rationality and Moral Realism.Nick Zangwill - 2012 - Ratio 25 (3):345-364.
True to Ourselves.Jan Bransen - 1998 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):67 – 85.
Why Be Rational?Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.
Naturalising Normativity.Mark Colyvan - 2009 - In David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. MIT Press.
Scotus's Interpretation of Metaphysics 9.2.Cruz González-Ayesta - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:217-230.
Relativism and Normative Nonrealism.Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 54:115-137.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-04-14

Total views
107 ( #66,420 of 2,327,914 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #344,211 of 2,327,914 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature