Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):85-113 (2000)

Authors
Tad Schmaltz
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
This article considers complications for the principle in Descartes that effects are similar to their causes that are connected to his own denial that terms apply "univocally" to God and the creatures He produces. Descartes suggested that there remains an "analogical" relation in virtue of which our mind can be said to be similar to God's. However, this suggestion is undermined by the implication of his doctrine of the creation of the eternal truths that God's will differs entirely from our own. The disappearance of analogy is even more evident in Spinoza and Regis. Both linked Descartes's doctrine to the principle that an effect differs from its cause with respect to what it receives from that cause, and both argued from that principle to the conclusion that we differ from God in both essence and existence
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI cjphil200030125
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Study of Spinoza's Ethics.Roger Ariew - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (4):649-654.
The Infinite in Descartes' Conversation with Burman.Roger Ariew - 1987 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 69 (2):140-163.
Descartes and the Nature of Body ( Principles of Philosophy, 2.4-19).Roger S. Woolhouse - 1994 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2 (1):19 – 33.
Rejoinder to Richardson and Loeb.Daisie Radner - 1985 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (2):232-236.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Spinoza’s ‘Infinite Modes’ Reconsidered.Kristin Primus - 2019 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 1 (1):1-29.
Substance and Independence in Descartes.Anat Schechtman - 2016 - Philosophical Review 125 (2):155-204.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Radość. Ujęcie Descartes’a i Spinozy.Jolanta Żelazna - 2009 - In Zbigniew Drozdowicz (ed.), Filozofia XVII wieku i jej kontynuacje. Wydawnictwo Fundacji Humaniora.
Cartesian Causation: Body–Body Interaction, Motion, and Eternal Truths.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):737-762.
The Immortality of the Soul in Descartes and Spinoza.Edwin M. Curley - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:27-41.
Stoic Psychotherapy in Descartes and Spinoza.Derk Pereboom - 1994 - Faith and Philosophy 11 (4):592-625.
A Note on Descartes and Spinoza.Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (3):379-380.
Reformas epistemológicas: Descartes, Spinoza, Bateson.Germán Bula - 2011 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 19:141-164.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
54 ( #184,684 of 2,410,430 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,320 of 2,410,430 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes