Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):89-101 (2013)
The thesis of theory-ladenness of observations, in its various guises, is widely considered as either ill-conceived or harmless to the rationality of science. The latter view rests partly on the work of the proponents of New Experimentalism who have argued, among other things, that experimental practices are efficient in guarding against any epistemological threat posed by theory-ladenness. In this paper I show that one can generate a thesis of theory-ladenness for experimental practices from an influential New Experimentalist account. The notion I introduce for this purpose is the concept of ‘theory-driven data reliability judgments’, according to which theories which are sought to be tested with a particular set of data guide reliability judgments about those very same data. I provide various prominent historical examples to show that TDRs are used by scientists to resolve data conflicts. I argue that the rationality of the practices which employ TDRs can be saved if the independent support of the theories driving TDRs is construed in a particular way
|Keywords||Theoretical virtues Theory-ladenness Experiment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Circularity, Reliability, and the Cognitive Penetrability of Perception.Jack Lyons - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):289-311.
Citations of this work BETA
Novelty, Coherence, and Mendeleev’s Periodic Table.Samuel Schindler - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45 (1):62-69.
What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework.Sabina Leonelli - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):810-821.
A Matter of Kuhnian Theory-Choice?: The GWS Model and the Neutral Current.Samuel Schindler - 2014 - Perspectives on Science 22 (4):491-522.
Similar books and articles
Bogen and Woodward's Data-Phenomena Distinction, Forms of Theory-Ladenness, and the Reliability of Data.Samuel Schindler - 2011 - Synthese 182 (1):39-55.
The Theory-Ladenness of Observation and the Theory-Ladenness of the Rest of the Scientific Process.William F. Brewer & Bruce L. Lambert - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 3 (September):S176-S186.
Theory-Ladenness of Perception Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:287 - 299.
Theory-Ladenness of Observations as a Test Case of Kuhn's Approach to Scientific Inquiry.Jaakko Hintikka - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:277-286.
Theory Construction and Experimentation in High Energy Particle Physics, Circa 1960-1970.Koray Karaca - unknown -
Theory-Ladenness of Evidence: A Case Study From History of Chemistry.K. P. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):351-368.
Theory-Ladenness and Theory Comparison.William B. Jones - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:83 - 92.
Why Worry About Theory-Dependence? Circularity, Minimal Empiricality and Reliability.Matthias Adam - 2004 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):117 – 132.
Technological Medicine and the Autonomy of Man.Bjørn Hofmann - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):157-167.
Data and Phenomena: A Distinction Reconsidered. [REVIEW]Bruce Glymour - 2000 - Erkenntnis 52 (1):29-37.
Erkenntnistheoretische Und Ontologische Probleme der Theoretischen Begriffe.Marco Buzzoni - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (1):19-53.
The Theory-Ladenness of Observations, the Role of Scientific Instruments, and the Kantian a Priori.Ragnar Fjelland - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):269 – 280.
Added to index2012-10-26
Total downloads227 ( #14,845 of 2,126,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #14,167 of 2,126,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.