Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1):133-156 (2011)
AbstractMarket-based social governance schemes that establish standards of conduct for producers and traders in international supply chains aim to reduce the negative socioenvironmental effects of globalization. While studies have examined how characteristics of social governance schemes promote socially responsible producer behavior, it has not yet been examined how these same characteristics affect consumer behavior. This is a crucial omission, because without consumer demand for socially produced products, the reach of the social benefits is likely to be limited. We develop a comprehensive model that links twocharacteristics of market-based social governance schemes— stringency and enforcement of requirements, and promotion—to two conditions required for governance schemes to generate significant social benefits: socially responsible behavior of participating firms; and consumer demand for socially produced products which, in turn, expands products produced according to social governance schemes, and thus, the quantity of social benefits. We discuss market-based social governance schemes in the context of fair trade coffee.
Similar books and articles
The Missing Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Trust: The Case of Fair Trade Products.Sandro Castaldo, Francesco Perrini, Nicola Misani & Antonio Tencati - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):1-15.
Fair-Trade Coffee: The Prospects and Pitfalls of Market Driven Social Justice: Brewing Justice: Fair-Trade Coffee, Sustainability, and Survival: Fair-Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalization.Mark Hudson & Ian Hudson - 2009 - Historical Materialism 17 (2):237-252.
On the Mandatory Governance and Voluntary Governance Based on the Information Rights Allocation.Lian-fu Ma & De-qiu Chen - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:51-57.
The Urgency and Necessity of a Different Type of Market: The Perspective of Producers Organized Within the Fair Trade Market.Francisco VanderHoff Boersma - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (S1):51-61.
The Co-Operative and the Corporation: Competing Visions of the Future of Fair Trade.Gavin Fridell - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (S1):81 - 95.
Noble Goals and Challenging Terrain: Organic and Fair Trade Coffee Movements in the Global Marketplace. [REVIEW]Robert A. Rice - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (1):39-66.
Regulating Sustainability in the Coffee Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Third-Party Environmental and Social Certification Initiatives. [REVIEW]Laura T. Raynolds, Douglas Murray & Andrew Heller - 2007 - Agriculture and Human Values 24 (2):147-163.
Do Ethical Values Work? A Quantitative Study of the Impact of Fair Trade Coffee on Consumer Behavior.Patrice Cailleba & Herbert Casteran - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (4):613-624.
Impacts of Fair Trade Certification on Coffee Farmers, Cooperatives, and Laborers in Nicaragua.Joni Valkila & Anja Nygren - 2010 - Agriculture and Human Values 27 (3):321-333.
The Development of a Market for Sustainable Coffee in The Netherlands: Rethinking the Contribution of Fair Trade. [REVIEW]Paul T. M. Ingenbleek & Machiel J. Reinders - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 113 (3):461-474.
An Exploration of Opportunities for the Growth of the Fair Trade Market: Three Cases of Craft Organisations.Debora C. Randall - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 56 (1):55-67.
Fair-Trade Coffee and Commodity Fetishism: The Limits of Market-Driven Social Justice.Gavin Fridell - 2007 - Historical Materialism 15 (4):79-104.
Securities Market and Corporate Governance of Privatised Firms.Viet Ha Hoang - 2006 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):254-279.
Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness.Candice Delmas - 2014 - Law and Philosophy 33 (4):465-488.
Fair Trade Standards, Corporate Participation, and Social Movement Responses in the United States.Daniel Jaffee - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (2):267 - 285.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards.Sandra Waddock - 2011 - Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1):23-44.
Positive Economics and the Normativistic Fallacy: Bridging the Two Sides of CSR.Philipp Schreck, Dominik van Aaken & Thomas Donaldson - 2013 - Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (2):297-329.
Marking Their Own Homework: The Pragmatic and Moral Legitimacy of Industry Self-Regulation.Frances Bowen - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 156 (1):257-272.
Consumption Ethics: A Review and Analysis of Future Directions for Interdisciplinary Research. [REVIEW]Michal Carrington, Andreas Chatzidakis, Helen Goworek & Deirdre Shaw - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 168 (2):215-238.
Corporate Social Responsibility Failures: How Do Consumers Respond to Corporate Violations of Implied Social Contracts?Cristel Antonia Russell, Dale W. Russell & Heather Honea - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 136 (4):759-773.
References found in this work
Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer. [REVIEW]Scott J. Vitell & James Muncy - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (8):585 - 597.
What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features?Pat Auger, Paul Burke, Timothy M. Devinney & Jordan J. Louviere - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):281 - 304.
The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, Issues and Future Research. [REVIEW]Geoff Moore - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):73-86.
Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 42, Number 3 - SpringerLink.Pat Auger, Paul Burke, Timothy M. Devinney & Jordan J. Louviere - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):281-304.
Why People Don’T Take Their Concerns About Fair Trade to the Supermarket: The Role of Neutralisation. [REVIEW]Andreas Chatzidakis, Sally Hibbert & Andrew P. Smith - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 74 (1):89 - 100.