The interplay between science and theology in uncovering the matrix of human morality

Zygon 28 (1):61-75 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theology and the life sciences are mutually dependent on one another in the task of understanding the origin and function of moral behavior. The life sciences investigate morality from the perspective of the historical and communal dimension of humanity and point to survival as the primary function of human behavior. A Christian ethic of self‐sacrifice advances the preservation of the entire human and nonhuman creation and should not, therefore, be objected to by the life sciences. Religion, however, is more than a survival mechanism. It points to a preserving agency beyond humanity and prevents the life sciences from reducing life to its strictly biological side.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Meaning of Mind: Language, Morality, and Neuroscience.Thomas Szasz - 1996 - Westport, Conn.: Syracuse University Press.
The Theology of Marriage in "Humanae Vitae".Theodore Mackin - 1971 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 46 (2):213-226.
The Philosophy of Human Evolution.Michael Ruse - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
The Biological Base of Morality?Paul R. Lawrence - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 4:59-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
39 (#398,894)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science and human behavior.B. F. Skinner - 1954 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 144:268-269.
Beyond Fredom and Dignity.B. F. Skinner - 1973 - Science and Society 37 (2):227-229.

View all 13 references / Add more references