In Florian Demont-Biaggi (ed.), The Nature of Peace and the Morality of Armed Conflict. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 123-140 (2017)

Authors
Anne Schwenkenbecher
Murdoch University
Abstract
Just war scholars are increasingly focusing on the importance of jus post bellum – justice after war – for the legitimacy of military campaigns. Should something akin to jus post bellum standards apply to terrorist campaigns? Assuming that at least some terrorist actors pursue legitimate goals or just causes, do such actors have greater difficulty satisfying the prospect-of-success criterion of Just War Theory than military actors? Further, may the use of the terrorist method as such – state or non-state – jeopardize lasting peace in a way that other violent, for instance military, strategies do not? I will argue that there appears to be little reason to believe that terrorist campaigns are in principle less able to secure or at least contribute to a lasting peace than military campaigns; quite to the contrary. Or, put differently, if terrorism is an unlikely method for securing peace, then war is an even more unlikely one.
Keywords Just War Theory  Jus post bellum  Prospect of Success  Terrorism  Political Violence  Non-state agents  Justice after war
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Morality of War.Brian Orend - 2006 - Broadview Press.
Proportionality in the Morality of War.Thomas Hurka - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1):34-66.
On the Ethics of War and Terrorism.Uwe Steinhoff - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Jus Post Bellum.Gary J. Bass - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (4):384-412.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice.May Larry & Edenberg Elizabeth (eds.) - 2013 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jus Post Bellum and Political Reconciliation.Colleen Murphy & Linda Radzik - 2013 - In Larry May & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taking Terrorism and ROE Seriously.Ted Westhusing - 2003 - Journal of Military Ethics 2 (1):1-19.
Kant's Ethics of War and Peace.Brian Orend - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Self-Defence, Just War, and a Reasonable Prospect of Success.Suzanne Uniacke - 2014 - In Helen Frowe & Gerald Lang (eds.), How We Fight. Oxford University Press. pp. 62-74.
Jus Ante Bellum.Maureen H. O’Connell - 2011 - Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 21 (1):3-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-13

Total views
293 ( #25,258 of 2,343,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #9,648 of 2,343,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes