Argumentation 35 (3):361-388 (2020)
AbstractWhile the role of discourse connectives has long been acknowledged in argumentative frameworks, these approaches often take a coarse-grained approach to connectives, treating them as a unified group having similar effects on argumentation. Based on an empirical study of the straw man fallacy, we argue that a more fine-grained approach is needed to explain the role of each connective and illustrate their specificities. We first present an original corpus study detailing the main features of four causal connectives in French that speakers routinely use to attribute meaning to another speaker, which is a key element of straw man fallacies. We then assess the influence of each of these connectives in a series of controlled experiments. Our results indicate each connective has different effects for the persuasiveness of straw man fallacies, and that these effects can be explained by differences in their semantic profile, as evidenced in our corpus study. Taken together, our results demonstrate that connectives are important for argumentation but should be analyzed individually, and that the study of fallacies should include a fine-grained analysis of the linguistic elements typically used in their formulation.
Similar books and articles
Pragmatic connectives, argumentative coherence and relevance.Jacques Moeschler - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (3):321-339.
Insertion of connectives by 9- to 11-year-old children in an argumentative text.Sylvie Akiguet & Annie Piolat - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (2):253-270.
The linguistic marking of coherence relations.Jet Hoek, Sandrine Zufferey, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J. M. Sanders - 2018 - Pragmatics and Cognition 25 (2):276-309.
Connectives without truth tables.Nathan Klinedinst & Daniel Rothschild - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (2):137-175.
On the Meaning of Connectives (Apropos of a Non-Necessitarianist Challenge).Luis Estrada-González - 2011 - Logica Universalis 5 (1):115-126.
Polylogical fallacies: Are there any?Marcin Lewiński - 2013 - Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference 10.
Noisy vs. Merely Equivocal Logics.Patrick Allo - 2013 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Springer. pp. 57--79.
Connectives and frame theory: the case of hypotextual antinomial "and".Eliza Kitis - 2000 - Pragmatics and Cognition 8 (2):357-410.
La fonction argumentative des marques de la langue.Dominique Bassano & Christian Champaud - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (2):175-199.
On Combined Connectives.A. Sernadas, C. Sernadas & J. Rasga - 2011 - Logica Universalis 5 (2):205-224.
Connectives and frame theory: The case of hypotextual antinomial ‘and’.Eliza Kitis - 2000 - Pragmatics and Cognition 8 (2):357-409.
Fallacy and argumentational vice.Andrew Aberdein - 2013 - In Dima Mohammed & Marcin Lewinski (eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 22–25, 2013. OSSA.
An Algebraic Approach to Intuitionistic Connectives.Xavier Caicedo & Roberto Cignoli - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1620-1636.
Simple characterization of functionally complete one‐element sets of propositional connectives.Petar Maksimović & Predrag Janičić - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):498-504.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them.Katharina Stevens - 2021 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 54 (2):109-127.
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues.Marcin Lewinski - 2021 - Informal Logic 42 (4):421-451.
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation.Marcin Koszowy, Steve Oswald, Katarzyna Budzynska, Barbara Konat & Pascal Gygax - 2022 - Informal Logic 42 (4):49-82.
Free Speech Fallacies as Meta-Argumentative Errors.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - forthcoming - Argumentation:1-11.
References found in this work
Relevance: Communication and Cognition.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986/1995 - Oxford: Blackwell.
Relevance.D. Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 2.