The limits of conceptual analysis

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):425-453 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It would be nice if good old a priori conceptual analysis were possible. For many years conceptual analysis was out of fashion, in large part because of the excessive ambitions of verificationist theories of meaning._ _However, those days are over._ _A priori conceptual analysis is once again part of the philosophical mainstream._ _This renewed popularity, moreover, is well-founded. Modern philosophical analysts have exploited developments in philosophical semantics to formulate analyses which avoid the counterintuitive consequences of verificationism, while vindicating our ability to know a priori precisely what it is our words and thoughts represent._ _Despite its apparent promise, however, I

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,916

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Concepts and conceptual analysis.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):253-282.
A priori entailment and conceptual analysis: Making room for type-c physicalism.J. L. Dowell - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):93 – 111.
Experimental philosophers, conceptual analysts, and the rest of us. Fran - 2008 - Philosophical Explorations 11 (2):143 – 149.
Commentary on Frank Jackson’s From Metaphysics to Ethics.Katalin Balog - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):645–652.
Has psychology debunked conceptual analysis?Per Sandin - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (1):26–33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
360 (#33,870)

6 months
6 (#145,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura Schroeter
University of Melbourne