The nature of symbols in the language of thought

Mind and Language 24 (5):523-553 (2009)

Authors
Susan Schneider
University of Connecticut
Abstract
The core of the language of thought program is the claim that thinking is the manipulation of symbols according to rules. Yet LOT has said little about symbol natures, and existing accounts are highly controversial. This is a major flaw at the heart of the LOT program: LOT requires an account of symbol natures to naturalize intentionality, to determine whether the brain even engages in symbol manipulations, and to understand how symbols relate to lower-level neurocomputational states. This paper provides the much-needed theory of symbols, and in doing so, alters the LOT program in significant respects.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01373.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,938
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 51 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Informational Semantics and Frege Cases.Matthew Rellihan - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (3):267-294.
Conceptual Atomism Rethought.Susan Schneider - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):224-225.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-10-27

Total views
123 ( #54,963 of 2,319,364 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #335,223 of 2,319,364 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature