Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (6):573-587 (1992)
Using the right to die and the United States Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health as exemplars, this article explores the notion of third-order decisionmaking. If first order decisionmaking is about what should happen, and second-order decisionmaking is about who should decide what should happen, then third-order decisionmaking is about who should decide who decides. This turns out to be an apt characterization of constitutionalism, which is centrally concerned with the allocation of responsibility for making decisions about the allocation of responsibility. Deference to erroneous second-order decisions, as in the Cruzan case itself, may merely be an example of this central feature of constitutionalism. Keywords: constitutionalism, Cruzan case, right-to-die, rules CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Zur Unterscheidung von terminaler Sedierung und Sterbehilfe.Prof Dr Govert A. Den Hartogh - 2004 - Ethik in der Medizin 16 (4):378-391.
Similar books and articles
The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics.Hedley Bull - 2012 - Columbia University Press.
Moral Responsibility and Mental Illness: A Case Study.Matthew Broome, Lisa Bortolotti & Matteo Mameli - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (19):179-187.
Moral Consensus in Public Ethics: Patient Autonomy and Family Decisionmaking in the Work of One State Bioethics Commission.Ellen H. Moskowitz - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):149-168.
Clinical Ethics as Medical Hermeneutics.David C. Thomasma - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Two Constitutionalisms in Europe: Pursuing an Articulation of the European and International Legal Orders.Jean D'Aspremont & Frédéric Dopagne - unknown
Rational Diagnosis and Treatment.Henrik R. Wulff - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (2):123-134.
Privacy and Autonomy: From Warren and Brandeis to Roe and Cruzan.Thomas Halper - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):121-135.
Publicity and Pricelessness: Grassroots Decisionmaking and Justice in Rationing.James Lindemann Nelson - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):333-342.
Added to index2010-08-22
Total downloads14 ( #331,088 of 2,163,689 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,689 )
How can I increase my downloads?