Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):183-188 (2010)

Kevin Scharp
University of St. Andrews
Hartry Field’s book, Saving Truth from Paradox, is without question among the best works on truth and the liar paradox in the analytic tradition—it should become the standard reference on the liar paradox for years to come. Field offers lucid, technically accurate, but accessible discussions of most of the approaches to the liar paradox that are currently being debated in the literature. He also defends his favored approach, which requires a change from classical to paracomplete logic. After a brief flirtation with dialetheism around the turn of the century, he now offers a novel, powerful, and technically dazzling way of dealing with the liar paradox to accompany his influential version of disquotationalism.2 Together they provide a unified view of the nature and logic of truth.3 Field’s solution to the liar together with his fair and charitable discussion of the alternatives make this book required reading by anyone remotely interested in issues associated with truth, philosophical logic, and philosophy of language. The book covers much the same ground as several of Field’s recent papers on the liar paradox4, but this is not a collection; instead, Field has written the book from scratch in a way that informs the..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.634.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An Argument Against Jago’s Theory of Truth.Bradley Armour-Garb - 2021 - Wiley: Analytic Philosophy 62 (4):427-438.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Should Selecting Saviour Siblings Be Banned?S. Sheldon - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):533-537.
Falsity.Kevin Scharp - 2010 - In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave-Macmillan.
A Revenge Problem Without the Concept of Truth.Mark Pinder - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):151-161.
Tatian: Perfection According To The Saviour.J. Harris - 1924 - Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 8 (1):15-51.
A Relational Approach to Saviour Siblings?Michael J. Selgelid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (12):924-925.
Saviour Siblings: Reply to Critics.Michelle Taylor-Sands - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (12):933-934.
Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. [REVIEW]Kevin Scharp - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):541-543.
Kevin Scharp, Replacing Truth.John P. Burgess - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (5):1087-1089.
Is There a Duty to Create Saviour Siblings?Werner Wolbert - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (1):22-28.


Added to PP index

Total views
134 ( #89,559 of 2,533,564 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #390,861 of 2,533,564 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes