The structure of context: Deciphering "frame analysis"

Sociological Theory 23 (4):368-385 (2005)
Abstract
This article proposes that Goffman's "Frame Analysis" can be interpreted as a step toward unpacking the idea of context. His analysis implies a recursive model involving frames within frames. The key problem is that neither Goffman nor anyone else has clearly defined what is meant by a frame. I propose that it can be represented by a word, phrase, or proposition. A subjective context can be represented as an assembly of these items, joined together by operators such as and, since, if, not, and then. Furthermore, this model can be combined with the recursive levels of mutual awareness in earlier approaches to consensus. The combination would represent the inter subjective context: it can be used to find the minimum amount of background that would allow consensual interpretations of discourse. It could also construct a chain that links discourse to the institutional level, the micro-macro pathway from word and gesture to social structure. Goffman hinted that mathematical notation might be used to represent a frame assembly. By adding levels of awareness to such notation, it could represent social facts. Because the use of vernacular words rather than concepts is a problem in social science, Goffman's approach has a general as well as a particular significance
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00259.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,248
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Relevance.D. Sperber & D. Wilson - 1995 - Blackwell.
The Nature of Explanation.Kenneth James Williams Craik - 1943 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Remembering.F. C. Bartlett - 1935 - Scientia 29 (57):221.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bullshit as a Problem of Social Epistemology.Joshua Wakeham - 2017 - Sociological Theory 35 (1):15-38.
The Boundaries of Context and Their Significance.Guo Guichun - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):449-460.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
214 ( #19,011 of 2,192,160 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #145,324 of 2,192,160 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature