'Through thousands of errors we reach the truth'—but how? On the epistemic roles of error in scientific practice

This essay is concerned with the epistemic roles of error in scientific practice. Usually, error is regarded as something negative, as an impediment or obstacle for the advancement of science. However, we also frequently say that we are learning from error. This common expression suggests that the role of error is not—at least not always—negative but that errors can make a fruitful contribution to the scientific enterprise. My paper explores the latter possibility. Can errors play an epistemically productive role in scientific research? The paper begins with a review of several twentieth-century approaches to error and the various agendas behind them. It is shown that only very few scholars have considered whether errors can be productive. The main part of the paper examines a concrete debate in early nineteenth-century microscopy and analyses how the microscopists coped with the problem of error. Drawing on this material, the article offers some terminological clarifications of the common notion ‘learning from error’. The conclusion argues that error can indeed play epistemically productive roles in scientific practice.Keywords: Error; Nineteenth-century microscopic anatomy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.06.011
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,182
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Error Statistics and Duhem's Problem.Gregory Wheeler - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):410-420.
Error Types.Douglas Allchin - 2001 - Perspectives on Science 9 (1):38-58.
Towards a Typology of Experimental Errors: An Epistemological View.Giora Hon - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (4):469-504.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Digital ‘Faces’ of Synthetic Biology.Kathrin Friedrich - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (2):217-224.
On the Art of Being Wrong: An Essay on the Dialectic of Errors.Sverre Wide - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):573-588.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Taxonomy of Errors for Information Systems.Giuseppe Primiero - 2014 - Minds and Machines 24 (3):249-273.
Inductive Risk and Values in Science.Heather Douglas - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (4):559-579.
Contextualism About Knowledge and Justification by Default.Marcus Willaschek - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):251-272.
Moral Error Theory and the Argument From Epistemic Reasons.Richard Rowland - 2013 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (1):1-24.
Errors Upon Errors: A Reply to Joyce.Stephen Finlay - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):535 - 547.
Natural Laws in Scientific Practice.Marc Lange - 2000 - Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

19 ( #259,912 of 2,172,023 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #173,295 of 2,172,023 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums