Human Studies 45 (1):1-25 (2022)

Authors
David A. Stone
Oakland University
Abstract
Questions about what experts need to know to facilitate their collaboration in interdisciplinary situations are usually answered with proposals concerning the technical methods, epistemic ground rules, and explanatory theories that one applies “across” disciplines, just as such methods, rules, and theories are applied “within” a discipline. However, phenomenology offers something better. Instead of following the traditional route of looking for general conditions that apply to collaborative practice, phenomenology turns to what actually happens in collaborative experience and shows that success is not just a function of applied procedures, even when they are in play. Instead, individual experts seem to rediscover their ability to keep their thoughts and concepts looser, more informal, and open-endedly responsive to the situation—just as they did when they first began to shape unfamiliar circumstances into a regionally shared practice—only now with potentially interdisciplinary circumstances as their experienced phenomenon. By cultivating an awareness of how it is with life prior to its being variously studied, exploited, or harnessed to explanatory theories and essentialist ideas, they remain open to becoming expert collaborators, just as they are already regional experts. An example of this process is given from the authors’ recent field research.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10746-021-09616-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact.Ludwik Fleck - 1979 - University of Chicago Press.
The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity.Robert Frodeman (ed.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences.David Alvargonzález - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):387-403.
For a Better World?William D. Dennison - 2014 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 26 (1-2):57-72.
Transdisciplinarity and Conceptual Change.Sue L. T. McGregor - 2014 - World Futures 70 (3-4):200-232.
The Politics of Materiality: Affective Encounters in a Transdisciplinary Debate.Sari Irni - 2013 - European Journal of Women's Studies 20 (4):347-360.
Beauvoir's Transdisciplinarity: From Philosophy to Gender Theory.Stella Sandford - 2017 - In Laura E. Hengehold & Nancy Bauer (eds.), A Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 15-27.
Nicolescu, Basarab. Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. [REVIEW]K. Helmut Reich - 2003 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 15 (1-2):207-208.
Interdisciplinary Higher Education.W. Martin Davies & Marcia Devlin - 2010 - In W. Martin Davies, Marcia Devlin & Malcolm Tight (eds.), Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Perspectives and Practicalities. Bingley, UK: pp. 3-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-01

Total views
3 ( #1,358,108 of 2,507,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,626 of 2,507,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes