Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 32 (1):69-101 (2022)
Authors | |
Abstract |
How to deal with non-epistemic values in science presents a pressing
problem for science and society as well as for philosophers of science. In recent
years, accounts of democratizing science have been proposed as a possible solution
to this. By providing a case study on the establishment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy comment: Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
comment: (IPBES), I argue that such accounts run into a problem when values
are embedded in the general scientific and societal setup to such an extent that
they shape the terrain upon which such a democratization needs to take place.
I introduce the notion of particularities as manifestations of values in science
and state a problem of particularity, posed by the ways in which the interactive
dimension of particularities interferes with democratic procedures for resolving
value judgements in science. As a possible remedy, I propose enriching accounts
of democratizing science by agonistic theories of democracy
|
Keywords | values in science agonistic democracy biodiversity research |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1353/ken.2022.0003 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Protection of Biodiversity for the Sake of Science?Gesine Schepers - 2014 - In Dirk Lanzerath & Minou Friele (eds.), Concepts and Values in Biodiversity. Routledge Studies in Biodiversity Politics and Management 1. Routledge. pp. 329-348.
Biodiversity as the Source of Biological Resources: A New Look at Biodiversity Values.Paul M. Wood - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (3):251 - 268.
From a Variety of Ethics to the Integrity and Congruence of Research on Biodiversity Conservation.Claire Lajaunie - 2018 - Asian Bioethics Review 10 (4):313-332.
Science and values in the biodiversity-ecosystem function debate.David M. Frank - 2022 - Biology and Philosophy 37 (2):1-22.
Talking About the Birds and the Bees: Biodiversity Claims Making at the Local Level.Carol Morris & Amanda Wragg - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (1):71-90.
Microbial Diversity and the “Lower-Limit” Problem of Biodiversity.Christophe Malaterre - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (2):219-239.
Science and Sentiment: Grinnell’s Fact-Based Philosophy of Biodiversity Conservation.Ayelet Shavit & James R. Griesemer - 2018 - Journal of the History of Biology 51 (2):283-318.
Putting Biodiversity Conservation Into Practice: The Importance of Local Culture, Economy, Governance, and Community Values.Anya Plutynski - 2016 - In Justin Garson, Sahotra Sarkar & Anya Plutynski (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Biodiversity. pp. 281-294.
Biodefense and Dual-Use Research: The Optimisation Problem and the Value of Security.Michael J. Selgelid - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):205-206.
A Strong Role for Custom in International Wildlife Litigation.Kirk W. Junker - 2014 - Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 17:32-61.
The Behavioral Economics of Biodiversity Conservation Scientists.Mark Vellend - 2019 - Philosophical Topics 47 (1):219-237.
The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Biodiversity.Justin Garson, Anya Plutynski & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.) - 2017 - Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-04-14
Total views
4 ( #1,282,334 of 2,517,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,427 of 2,517,928 )
2022-04-14
Total views
4 ( #1,282,334 of 2,517,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,427 of 2,517,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads