Evolution, Intelligent Design and Public Education: A Comment on Thomas Nagel

Spontaneous Generations 3 (1):35-40 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Nagel recently proposed that the exclusion of Intelligent Design from science classrooms is inappropriate and that there needs to be room for “noncommittal discussion.” It is shown that Nagel’s policy proposals do not ?t the conclusions of his arguments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public education and intelligent design.Thomas Nagel - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2):187-205.
Intelligent design in cultural evolution.Lee Cronk - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):352-353.
Darwinism, design, and public education.John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.) - 2003 - East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Creationism and Intelligent Design.Robert T. Pennock - 2003 - Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 4:143-163.
Design, Yes; Intelligent, No.Massimo Pigliucci - 2001 - Philosophy Now 32:26-29.
Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW]Sahotra Sarkar - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
91 (#184,378)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Robert B. Talisse
Vanderbilt University
Scott Aikin
Vanderbilt University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Public education and intelligent design.Thomas Nagel - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2):187-205.
Public Education and Intelligent Design.Thomas Nagel - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2):187-205.

Add more references