The evolution of communication: Humans may be exceptional

Interaction Studies 11 (1):78-99 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Communication is a fundamentally interactive phenomenon. Evolutionary biology recognises this fact in its definition of communication, in which signals are those actions that cause reactions, and where both action and reaction are designed for that reason. Where only one or the other is designed then the behaviours are classed as either cues or coercion. Since mutually dependent behaviours are unlikely to emerge simultaneously, the symmetry inherent in these definitions gives rise to a prediction that communication will only emerge if cues or coercive behaviours do so first. They will then be co-opted for communication. A range of case studies, from animal signalling, evolutionary robotics, comparative psychology, and evolutionary linguistics are used to test this prediction. The first three are found to be supportive. However in the Embodied Communication Game, a recent experimental approach to the emergence of communication between adult humans, communication emerges even when cues or coerced behaviours are not possible. This suggests that humans are exceptional in this regard. It is argued that the reason for this is the degree to which we are able and compelled to read and interpret the behaviour of others in intentional terms.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Evolution of Relevance.Thomas C. Scott-Phillips - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (4):583-601.
Cloning and Infertility.Carson Strong - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):279-293.
The evidence for evolution.Alan R. Rogers - 2011 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Toward a theory of embodied communication: Self-sustaining wild systems as embodied meaning.J. Scott Jordan - 2008 - In Ipke Wachsmuth, Manuela Lenzen & Günther Knoblich (eds.), Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines. Oxford University Press. pp. 53.
The Impact of 'Anthropotechnology' on Human Evolution.Sylvia Blad - 2010 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14 (2):72-87.
Co-evolution of human consciousness and language.Michael A. Arbib - 2001 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 929:195-220.
Dimensions of embodied communication—towards a typology of embodied communication.Jens Allvvood - 2008 - In Ipke Wachsmuth, Manuela Lenzen & Günther Knoblich (eds.), Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines. Oxford University Press. pp. 257.


Added to PP

40 (#409,702)

6 months
11 (#272,636)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Origins of Meaning: Must We ‘Go Gricean’?Dorit Bar-on - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (3):342-375.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Kellogg Lewis - 1969 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Animal Species and Evolution.Ernst Mayr - 1963 - Belknap of Harvard University Press.

View all 28 references / Add more references