Critical Inquiry 17 (4):773-797 (1991)

Abstract
There is a section in Samuel Delany’s magnificent autobiographical meditation, The Motion of Light in Water, that dramatically raises the problem of writing the history of difference, the history, that is, of the designation of “other,” of the attribution of characteristics that distinguish categories of people from some presumed norm.1 Delany recounts his reaction to his first visit to the St. Marks bathhouse in 1963. He remembers standing on the threshold of a “gym-sized room” dimly lit by blue bulbs. The room was full of people, some standing, the rest an undulating mass of naked, male bodies, spread wall to wall. My first response was a kind of heart-thudding astonishment very close to fear. I have written of a space at certain libidinal saturation before. That was not what frightened me. It was rather that the saturation was not only kinesthetic but visible.2Watching the scene establishes for Delany a “fact that flew in the face” of the prevailing representation of homosexuals in the 1950s as “isolated perverts,” as subjects “gone awry.” The “apprehension of massed bodies” gave him a “sense of political power”:what this experience said was that there was a population—not of individual homosexuals … not of hundreds, not of thousands, but rather of millions of gay men, and that history had, actively and already, created for us whole galleries of institutions, good and bad, to accommodate our sex. [M, p. 174] 2. Samuel R. Delany, The Motion of Light in Water: Sex and Science Fiction Writing in the East Village, 1957-1965 , p. 173; hereafter abbreviated M. Joan W. Scott is professor of social science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. She is the author, most recently, of Gender and the Politics of History and is currently at work on a history of feminist claims for political rights in France during the period 1789-1945 as a way of exploring arguments about equality and difference
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/448612
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,880
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Experience: Introduction.Jarrett Zigon & C. Jason Throop - 2014 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 42 (1):1-15.
E-Ducating the Gaze: The Idea of a Poor Pedagogy.Jan Masschelein - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (1):43-53.

View all 97 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Experience as Evidence.Joan W. Scott - 1994 - In James K. Chandler, Arnold Ira Davidson & Harry D. Harootunian (eds.), Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion Across the Disciplines. University of Chicago Press. pp. 363--81.
In Defense of Experience.Johanna Oksala - 2014 - Hypatia 29 (2):388-403.
The Implications of Experience for Psychological Theory.W. W. Meissner - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (4):503-528.
The Epistemic Force of Perceptual Experience.Susanna Schellenberg - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (1):87-100.
The Ambiguous Role of Experience in Cartesian Science.Desmond M. Clarke - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:151 - 164.
What Can We Say About the Inner Experience of the Young Child?Charles Fernyhough - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):143-144.
Nondoxastic Perceptual Evidence.Peter J. Markie - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):530-553.
Experience and Evidence.Nam-In Lee - 2007 - Husserl Studies 23 (3):229-246.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-17

Total views
131 ( #76,647 of 2,426,378 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #188,484 of 2,426,378 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes