British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):184-187 (2004)
AbstractMalcolm Budd argues that spatial metaphors are not involved in the musical experience at the ‘foundational’ level, and that my attempt to show that the musical experience is dependent on spatial concepts is therefore unwarranted. The argument that Budd gives for this conclusion does not seem to me to achieve its purpose, and his alternative suggestion, that musical movement is ‘merely temporal’ does not, I argue, amount to a genuine alternative. He is right to worry about my account of ‘double intentionality’, and about the relation between experience and concept. But these worries refer to general problems in the philosophy of mind and perception, and have no special bearing on the experience of music.
Similar books and articles
Piece for the End of Time: In Defence of Musical Ontology.Andrew Kania - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):65-79.
Melody and Metaphorical Movement.Rafael De Clercq - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):156-168.
Enacting Musical Content.Joel Krueger - 2011 - In Riccardo Manzotti (ed.), Situated Aesthetics: Art Beyond the Skin. Imprint Academic. pp. 63-85.
“Singing for Our Lives”: Women's Music and Democratic Politics.Nancy Sue Love - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (4):71-94.
Wittgenstein and the Understanding of Music.Roger Scruton - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):1-9.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Body and the Senses in Spatial Experience: The Implications of Kinesthetic and Synesthetic Perceptions for Design Thinking.Jain Kwon & Alyssa Iedema - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
On Music’s Subtle Expressiveness.Myriam Albor - 2016 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 7 (1):37-65.
References found in this work
No references found.