British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):184-187 (2004)
Malcolm Budd argues that spatial metaphors are not involved in the musical experience at the ‘foundational’ level, and that my attempt to show that the musical experience is dependent on spatial concepts is therefore unwarranted. The argument that Budd gives for this conclusion does not seem to me to achieve its purpose, and his alternative suggestion, that musical movement is ‘merely temporal’ does not, I argue, amount to a genuine alternative. He is right to worry about my account of ‘double intentionality’, and about the relation between experience and concept. But these worries refer to general problems in the philosophy of mind and perception, and have no special bearing on the experience of music.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Piece for the End of Time: In Defence of Musical Ontology.Andrew Kania - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):65-79.
Wittgenstein and the Understanding of Music.Roger Scruton - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):1-9.
"Singing for Our Lives": Women's Music and Democratic Politics.Nancy Sue Love - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (4):71-94.
Enacting Musical Content.Joel Krueger - 2011 - In Riccardo Manzotti (ed.), Situated Aesthetics: Art Beyond the Skin. Imprint Academic. pp. 63-85.
Melody and Metaphorical Movement.Rafael De Clercq - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):156-168.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #110,515 of 2,146,275 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,803 of 2,146,275 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.