The impairment/disability distinction: a response to Shakespeare

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1):26-27 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Tom Shakespeare’s important new book includes, among other topics, a persuasive critique of the social model of disability. A key component in his case against that model consists in an argument against the impairment/disability distinction as this is understood within the social model. The present paper focuses on the case Shakespeare makes against that distinction. Three arguments mounted by Shakespeare are summarised and responded to. It is argued that the responses adequately rebut Shakespeare’s case on this specific issue. Moreover, as the engagement with Shakespeare’s argument illustrates, his claim to employ a critical realist perspective appears to be in considerable tension with the case he offers against the impairment/disability distinction



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

54 (#302,463)

6 months
14 (#199,983)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen David Edwards
University of Zululand

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references