The Attribution of Aeschylus, Choephoroi 691–9

Classical Quarterly 39 (02):302- (1989)

Abstract

These lines are the first reaction to the false news of the death of Orestes. Their attribution has been much discussed. What prompts my intervention is the recent development, on this important problem, of a confident unanimity which seems to me certainly mistaken. I have been unable to find a single translator, editor, or commentator in recent years who gives the lines to Electra. The case for Electra was best made by Headlam–Thomson in 1938, and a few extra points were added very hesitantly by Winnington-Ingram in 1946. From the wealth of detailed argument in Headlam–Thomson, which has been ignored rather than refuted, I will mention and briefly develop just two points, before going on to add some of my own

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
13 (#775,530)

6 months
1 (#388,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Aeschylus, Choephoroi 275.T. C. Owtram - 1978 - Classical Quarterly 28 (02):475-.
Note on Aeschylus Choephoroi 225–230.J. C. Lawson - 1935 - Classical Quarterly 29 (02):83-.
Studies in Greek Philosophy.C. C. W. Taylor - 1999 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1):135 – 139.
Mystic Light in Aeschylus' Bassarai.Richard Seaford - 2005 - Classical Quarterly 55 (02):602-606.

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Dionysos and Katharsis in "Antigone".Scott Scullion - 1998 - Classical Antiquity 17 (1):96-122.

Add more citations