Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3 (1):23 (2008)
The ideology of evidence-base medicine (EBM) has dramatically altered the way we think, conceptualize, philosophize and practice medicine. One of its major pillars is the appraisal and classification of evidence. Although important and beneficial, this process currently lacks detail and is in need of reform. In particular, it largely focuses on three key dimensions (design, [type I] alpha error and beta [type II] error) to grade the quality of evidence and often omits other crucial aspects of evidence such as biological plausibility, reproducibility, generalizability, temporality, consistency and coherence. It also over-values the randomized trial and meta-analytical techniques, discounts the biasing effect of single centre execution and gives insufficient weight to large and detailed observational studies. Unless these aspects are progressively included into systems for grading, evaluating and classifying evidence and duly empirically assessed (according to the EBM paradigm), the EBM process and movement will remain open to criticism of being more evidence-biased than evidence-based
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):3-12.
Causation and Evidence-Based Practive - an Ontological Review.Roger Kerry, Thor Eirik Eriksen, Svein Anders Noer Lie, Stephen Mumford & Rani Lill Anjum - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):1006-1012.
Similar books and articles
A European Consistency for Functioning of RECs? We Just Lost Our Chance.Marcin Waligora - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (6):408-409.
Uncertainty and the Ethics of Clinical Trials.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):149-167.
The Research Misconception.Maurie Markman - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):241-252.
What is Clinical Effectiveness?R. Ashcroft - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (2):219-233.
A Clinical Trials Manual From the Duke Clinical Research Institute: Lessons From a Horse Named Jim.Margaret B. Liu - 2010 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Statistical Decisions and the Interim Analyses of Clinical Trials.Roger Stanev - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (1):61-74.
Against a Priori Judgements of Bad Methodology: Questioning Double-Blinding as a Universal Methodological Virtue of Clinical Trials.Jeremy Howick - unknown
What Makes Placebo-Controlled Trials Unethical?Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):3 – 9.
The Protection of Patients' Rights in Clinical Trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
Clinical Trials Registries: A Reform That is Past Due.Jennifer L. Gold & David M. Studdert - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 (4):811-820.
End of Life Pediatric Research: What About the Ethics? [REVIEW]Danielle Laudy - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):87-91.
Do Patients with Breast Cancer Participating in Clinical Trials Receive Better Nursing Care?Myriam Skrutkowska & Charles Weijer - unknown
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads16 ( #293,032 of 2,154,177 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,662 of 2,154,177 )
How can I increase my downloads?