Yesterday's algorithm: Penrose and the Godel argument

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (9):265-273 (2003)
Abstract
Roger Penrose is justly famous for his work in physics and mathematics but he is _notorious_ for his endorsement of the Gödel argument (see his 1989, 1994, 1997). This argument, first advanced by J. R. Lucas (in 1961), attempts to show that Gödel’s (first) incompleteness theorem can be seen to reveal that the human mind transcends all algorithmic models of it1. Penrose's version of the argument has been seen to fall victim to the original objections raised against Lucas (see Boolos (1990) and for a particularly intemperate review, Putnam (1994)). Yet I believe that more can and should be said about the argument. Only a brief review is necessary here although I wish to present the argument in a somewhat peculiar form.
Keywords Cognition  Incompleteness  Logic  Goedel  Penrose, R
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1333-1108
DOI croatjphil2003334
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Gaps in Penrose's Toiling.Rick Grush & P. Churchland - 1995 - In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Journal of Consciousness Studies. Ferdinand Schoningh. pp. 10-29.
The Emperor's New Mind.Roger Penrose - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Mechanism, Truth, and Penrose's New Argument.Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (1):19-42.
Remarks on Penrose's New Argument.Per Lindstrom - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):231-237.
Penrose's New Argument.Per Lindström - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):241-250.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
223 ( #20,761 of 2,235,837 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #149,634 of 2,235,837 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature