Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):48-55 (2006)
AbstractIn this article I challenge two common arguments against incest: the genetics argument (that incest is immoral because it might lead to the conception of a genetically deformed child), and the family argument (that incest is immoral because it undermines the family, the emotional center for the individual). These arguments, I contend, commit us to condemning not only incest, but also a wide range ofbehaviors that we currently permit. I thus present the reader with a dilemma: on pain of inconsistency, we must either accept certain forms of incest in order to maintain these other moral judgments, or reject these judgments in order to maintain our condemnation ofincest. The reader is free to decide which alternative is preferable, but I suggest that the former is a much less radical shift in our moral system as a whole
Similar books and articles
Vice is Nice But Incest is Best: The Problem of a Moral Taboo.Vera Bergelson - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):43-59.
What is Wrong with Incest?Jerome Neu - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):27 – 39.
The Severed Head and Existential Dread: The Classroom as Epistemic Community and Student Survivors of Incest.Nancy Potter - 1995 - Hypatia 10 (2):69 - 92.
Same-Sex Marriage, Slippery Slope Rhetoric, and the Politics of Disgust: A Critical Perspective on Contemporary Family Discourse and the Incest Taboo.Courtney M. Cahill - manuscript
Mum's the Word: Confidentiality and Incest.R. Higgs - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):100-104.
Marriage, Sex and Future Persons in Liberal Public Justification: Is There a Right to Incest?Andrew F. March - unknown
A Moral‐Philosophical Perspective on Paedophilia and Incest.Ben Spiecker & Jan Steutel - 2000 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 32 (3):283–291.
Rebirth Through Incest: On Deleuze's Early Jungianism.Christian Kerslake - 2004 - Angelaki 9 (1):135 – 157.
The Incest Prohibition and Food Taboos.Raoul Makarius & Elaine P. Halperin - 1960 - Diogenes 8 (30):41-61.
Phenomenology and the Incest Taboo.Peter Hadreas - 2002 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 33 (2):203-222.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Chewing Over In Vitro Meat: Animal Ethics, Cannibalism and Social Progress.Josh Milburn - 2016 - Res Publica 22 (3):249-265.
Contested Terms and Philosophical Debates.Manuel Vargas - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (10):2499-2510.
A Libertanian Critique of Incest Laws: Philosophical and Anthropological Perspectives.Gabriel Ernesto Andrade - 2021 - Human Affairs 31 (2):139-148.
References found in this work
No references found.