Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):40-52 (2011)
According to the incentives argument, inequalities in material goods are justifiable if they are to the benefit of the worst off members of society. In this paper, I point out what is easily overlooked, namely that inequalities are justifiable only if they are to the overall benefit of the worst off, that is, in terms of both material and social goods. I then address the question how gains in material goods can be weighed against probable losses in social goods. The ultimate criterion, so my idea, is how these gains and losses affect a person’s ability to reach her goals in life. Based on the idea that goals in life cannot be taken as given, I conclude that the absolute material gains are negligible compared to the losses of social goods and the disadvantage in the relative position caused by material inequalities.
|Keywords||inequality egalitarianism Rawls distributive justice incentives argument difference principle|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Inequality, Incentives and the Interpersonal Test.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2008 - Ratio 21 (4):421-439.
Cohen's Critique of Rawls: A Double Counting Objection.Alan Thomas - 2011 - Mind 120 (480):1099-1141.
Are Rawlsians Entitled to Monopoly Rights?Speranta Dumitru - 2008 - In A. Gosseries, A. Marciano & A. Strowel (eds.), Intelectual Property and Theories of Justice. Palgrave-MacMilan.
Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care About Distributions.Christian Schemmel - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):365-390.
Global Egalitarianism as a Practice-Independent Ideal.Merten Reglitz - 2011 - Dissertation, University of Warwick
Disparate Goods and Rawls' Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment.Allan Gibbard - 1979 - Theory and Decision 11 (3):267.
Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity.Richard J. Arneson - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
Monetary Incentives, What Are They Good For?Daniel Read - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):265-276.
Added to index2011-06-21
Total downloads158 ( #27,370 of 2,132,858 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #56,930 of 2,132,858 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.