Bloor, Latour, and the field

Abstract
The debate between Bloor and Latour is based on a fundamental misunderstanding due to too narrow a view of what Bloor calls 'the field'. The boundaries of this 'field' are not defined by the sociological analysis of the content of science: SSK and Latour do not share the same object of study. Latour's approach marks a shift from the social determinants of scientific knowledge to the ontological labour performed by scientific activity. The research on the science/society interface has generated two approaches. Some works tackle the social factors which determine science. Their object is society in science. Other works address the social role of science. Their object of study is science in society. The difference in the way SSK and Latour look at science is an incarnation of this division. A re-conceptualization of 'the field' based on the acknowledgement of these two objects is perhaps the only way to allow for a diversity of approaches in the study of the science/society interface.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00020-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,655
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Anti-Latour.D. Bloor - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112.
On the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and its Philosophical Agenda.M. Friedman - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):239-271.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Rescuing the Gorgias From Latour.Jeff Kochan - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):395-422.
Pro-Latour.Karen François - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (2):337-342.
Anti-Latour.D. Bloor - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112.
Latour's Heidegger.Jeff Kochan - 2010 - Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.
In-Between Science and Politics.Karen François - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (2):161-171.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

17 ( #280,852 of 2,158,196 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #195,105 of 2,158,196 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums