Israel Democracy Institute (2001)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The subject of this study is the justification for limiting negative expression directed at the government: its institutions and public officials, in order to preserve public faith in government. This paper is an abstract of a book that considers this question. The conclusion is that since the value of speech concerned with the performance of government is very high and the interest in protecting the status of government is limited and typically not substantial, there is generally no justification for legal restrictions of this kind.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy this book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Government Lawyer as Cause Lawyer: A Study of Three High Profile Government Lawsuits.Steven K. Berenson - unknown
Freedom of Expression: Justifications & Restrictions.Re'em Segev - 2008 - Israel Democracy Institute.
Expression as Realization: Speakers' Interests in Freedom of Speech.Jonathan Gilmore - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (5):517-539.
Freedom of Speech Abridged?: Cultural, Legal and Philosophical Challenges.Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.) - 2009 - Nordicom.
The Cringing and The Craven: Freedom of Expression In, Around, and Beyond The Workplace.Bruce Barry - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (2):263-296.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
50 ( #228,810 of 2,520,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,890 )
2009-01-28
Total views
50 ( #228,810 of 2,520,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads