Journal of Moral Philosophy:1-34 (forthcoming)

Authors
Re'em Segev
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Abstract
In this paper, I distinguish between two types of normative accounts of discrimination – general and special – and argue for the former and against the latter. General accounts consider the moral status of discrimination in light of all of the reasons that apply to discrimination, and hold that these reasons are not unique to discrimination (for example, the reasons to bring about the greater benefit or prevent the greater burden, to give priority for people who are worse off, and to give people what they morally deserve). In contrast, special accounts argue that discrimination is objectionable due to factors that are especially salient in the context of discrimination (examples are the "deliberative" freedom of people to decide how to live without considering facts such as their race or sex, the message conveyed by discriminatory actions in terms of the moral status of people, and the mental states that accompany discriminatory actions). I argue that general accounts are more plausible than special ones, as foundational accounts of discrimination that determine its overall moral status (both types of accounts appear to suggest such accounts). One argument is that special accounts that suggest conclusions regarding the overall moral status of discrimination without considering all of the pertinent factors, especially general ones, are implausible. Another argument is that special accounts that claim that the factors that they highlight are basic are misguided since these factors are morally significant only if, and to the degree to which, they are derived from general ones.
Keywords Discrimination   Reasons  Well-Being  Priority  Desert   Freedom  Resepct
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/17455243-20203273
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,759
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Making Sense of Discrimination.Re'em Segev - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (1):47-78.
The Badness of Discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):167-185.
Discrimination & Disrespect.Erin Beeghly - 2017 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (ed.), Routledge Handbook to the Ethics of Discrimination. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 83 - 96.
What's so Bad About Discrimination?Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (1):82-100.
What Makes Disability Discrimination Wrong?Jeffrey M. Brown - 2021 - Law and Philosophy 40 (1):1-31.
A Theory of Discrimination Law.Tarunabh Khaitan - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
A Theory of Discrimination Law.Tarunabh Khaitan - 2014 - Oxford University Press UK.
Equality, Justice and Legitimacy in Selection.Matthew Clayton - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):8-30.
Discrimination and Disrespect.Benjamin Eidelson - 2015 - Oxford University Press UK.
Discrimination Against Vegans.Oscar Horta - 2018 - Res Publica 24 (3):359-373.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-25

Total views
11 ( #809,991 of 2,432,634 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,117 of 2,432,634 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes