How Does Corporeality Inform Theorizing? Revisiting Hannah Arendt and the Banality of Evil

Human Studies 41 (4):545-563 (2018)

The perplexing relationship between two of the twentieth century’s most important philosophers, Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger, has been the subject of much speculation within academic circles. For Arendt, Heidegger was at once, her mentor, her lover, and her friend. In this paper, we juxtapose Arendt’s theory of the banality of evil against her relationship with Heidegger in an effort to consider the question: How does corporeality inform theorizing? In answering this question, we repudiate the conventional reading of the banality of evil, which attributes the theory to Arendt’s analysis of Adolf Eichmann during the latter’s criminal trial for the actions that he perpetrated in the operation of the Holocaust. Instead, we argue that the theory is, more compellingly, reflective of Arendt’s deeply personal attempts at making sense of Heidegger’s decision to affiliate himself with the German Nazi Party in the years preceding, and during, the Second World War. Through this revisionist account of the banality of evil, we animate the idea that theorizing is the discursive corollary, and belongs within the phenomenological parameters, of corporeality. Finally, we contend that any constructive understanding of how corporeality informs theorizing will only be realized, when there is a collapsing of the seemingly impervious philosophical boundaries that demarcate between ontology and epistemology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10746-018-9474-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,952
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Life of the Mind.Hannah Arendt - 1980 - Human Studies 3 (3):302-308.
Heidegger and 'Being and Time'.Stephen Mulhall - 1997 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 59 (1):177-177.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Radical Evil Banal? Is Banal Evil Radical?Paul Formosa - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735.
Villalobos, J. (edt.), Radicalidad y episteme.Mª E. López Ortega - 1992 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 26:266.
Thinking, Conscience and Acting in the Face of Mass Evil.Paul Formosa - 2010 - In Andrew Schaap, Danielle Celermajer & Vrasidas Karalis (eds.), Power, Judgement and Political Evil: In Conversation with Hannah Arendt. Farnham: Ashgate. pp. 89-104.
Hannah Arendt on Conscience and Evil.Arne Johan Vetlesen - 2001 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (5):1-33.
The Independent Thinking of Justice.Shuang Zhang - 2017 - Dialogue and Universalism 27 (4):147-159.
Is Evil Banal? : A Misleading Question.Richard J. Bernstein - 2010 - In Roger Berkowitz, Jeffrey Katz & Thomas Keenan (eds.), Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. Fordham University Press.
Between Banality and Radicality: Arendt and Kant on Evil and Responsibility.Javier Burdman - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (2):147488511664072.
The Banality of Evil and the Meaning of Punishment.Klaas Rozemond - 2016 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 78 (4):863-889.
Arendt, Augustine and Evil.David Grumett - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (2):154–169.
Arendt, Augustine And Evil[Abbreviati].David Grumett - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (2):154-169.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #776,937 of 2,266,521 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #437,211 of 2,266,521 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature