Introduction. Bruno Latour s’accorde-t-il au pluriel?

Symposium 22 (1):1-5 (2018)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Continental Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1917-9685
DOI 10.5840/symposium20182211
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,537
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bruno Latour: Existenzweisen. Eine Anthropologie der Modernen.Bruno Latour & Burkhard Liebsch - 2014 - Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 67 (4):356-366.
Bruno Latour and Actor-Network-Theory.Bozidar Filipovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (1):129-149.
Rescuing the Gorgias From Latour.Jeff Kochan - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):395-422.
The Author Rebounds: Latour to Oldroyd.Bruno Latour - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (2):183.
The Author Responds: Latour to Oldroyd.Bruno Latour - 1987 - Social Epistemology 1 (4):347 – 350.
Bruno Latour.Gerard de Vries - 2016 - Polity Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-11

Total downloads
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature