Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2049-2068 (2016)

Authors
Re'em Segev
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Abstract
Is there a reason to prevent deontological wrongdoing—an action that is wrong due to the violation of a decisive deontological constraint? This question is perplexing. On the one hand, the intuitive response seems to be positive, both when the question is considered in the abstract and when it is considered with regard to paradigmatic cases of deontological wrongdoing such as Bridge and Transplant. On the other hand, common theoretical accounts of deontological wrongdoing do not entail this answer, since not preventing wrongdoing does not necessarily amount to doing harm or intending harm, for example. The puzzle is reinforced due to the fact that the intuitive response to other cases seems to be different, namely that there is no reason in favour of preventing deontological wrongdoing. This question is thus interesting in itself. It might also shed light on additional questions such as the “paradox of deontology” and the appropriate response to wrongful actions more generally. Yet, despite its importance, this question is typically overlooked. The paper explores this question.
Keywords Deontology  Consequentialism  Wrongdoing  Prevention
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-015-0596-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Harvard University Press.
Turning the Trolley.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (4):359-374.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Should Law Track Morality?Re'em Segev - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (2):205-223.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corporate Wrongdoing.John Lipinski, Adele Queiroz, Jaime C. Rubin & M. J. Paula Soruco - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:263-266.
Is Evil Just Very Wrong?Todd Calder - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):177-196.
Blameworthiness Without Wrongdoing.Justin A. Capes - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):417-437.
Voluntary Benefits From Wrongdoing.Avia Pasternak - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (4):377-391.
Transnational Medical Aid and the Wrongdoing of Others.Keith Horton - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):171-179.
Deontological Restrictions and the Good/Bad Asymmetry.David Alm - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (4):464-481.
Violating Strict Deontological Constraints: Excuse or Pardon?Rudolf Schuessler - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (4):587-601.
‘Hate the Sin but Not the Sinner’: Forgiveness and Condemnation.Kelly Hamilton - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):114-123.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
195 ( #50,960 of 2,433,567 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #32,069 of 2,433,567 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes