When the Law Distinguishes Between the Enterprise and the Corporation: The Case of the New French Law on Corporate Purpose

Journal of Business Ethics 171 (1):1-13 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent French reform has revised the legal definition of the corporation. In essence, the law stipulates that the corporation must be run with due regard to the social and environmental impacts of its activity. It also introduces the notion of raison d’être and affords the possibility for any corporation to assign social or environmental purposes to itself, defined in its by-laws. This reform is similar to recent reforms in the UK and the US, but is based on an original and distinctive theoretical argument. The aim of our article is to analyze the fundamental tenets of this reform and their implications for the theory of the corporation. It shows that the new law is based on a new positive definition of the enterprise as not only an economic organization or a productive entity, but more fundamentally a space for innovative collective action. We argue that this view of the enterprise challenges our conceptualization of the corporation in two important ways. First, it shows that the traditional theories overlook the activities of the enterprise and their related impacts, and that the corporation is not necessarily the appropriate legal vehicle for the innovative enterprise. Second, it suggests that the stipulation of the enterprise’s purpose or raison d’être in the corporate by-laws can provide new promising legal foundations for corporate responsibility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Benefit Corporation as an Exemplar of Integrative Corporate Purpose.David Steingard & William Clark - 2016 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 35 (1):73-101.
Distributive Justice in Firms.Ian Maitland - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):129-143.
The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility.Janine S. Hiller - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2):287-301.
Corporate Responsibility Revisited.John Forge - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):13-32.
The ethical significance of corporate law.Jeffrey Nesteruk - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):723 - 727.
Benefit Corporations as a Distraction.Amy Klemm Verbos & Stephanie L. Black - 2017 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 36 (2):229-267.
Do Corporations Have Positive Fundamental Rights Obligations?David Bilchitz - 2010 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 57 (125):1-35.
Corporate Criminal Responsibility as Team Member Responsibility.Ian B. Lee - 2011 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (4):755-781.
GM and corporate responsibility.Richard T. De George - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177-179.
GM and corporate responsibility.Richard T. George - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177 - 179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-30

Downloads
30 (#521,181)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?