Action explanation and the free will debate: How incompatibilist arguments go wrong1

Philosophical Issues 22 (1):351-368 (2012)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00234.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,850
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Oxford University Press USA.
On Action.Carl Ginet - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Free Will and Probability.Danny Frederick - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):60-77.
Arguments for Incompatibilism.Kadri Vihvelin - 2003/2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions.Dylan Murray & Eddy Nahmias - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):434-467.
Experimental Philosophy on Free Will: An Error Theory for Incompatibilist Intuitions.Eddy Nahmias & Dylan Murray - 2010 - In Jesus Aguilar, Andrei Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 189--215.
Action, Intention, and Reason.Robert Audi - 1993 - Cornell University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
36 ( #158,365 of 2,214,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #88,234 of 2,214,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature