Action explanation and the free will debate: How incompatibilist arguments go wrong1

Philosophical Issues 22 (1):351-368 (2012)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00234.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,208
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Free Will and Probability.Danny Frederick - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):60-77.
Arguments for Incompatibilism.Kadri Vihvelin - 2003/2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions.Dylan Murray & Eddy Nahmias - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):434-467.
Experimental Philosophy on Free Will: An Error Theory for Incompatibilist Intuitions.Eddy Nahmias & Dylan Murray - 2010 - In Jesus Aguilar, Andrei Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 189--215.
Action, Intention, and Reason.Robert Audi - 1993 - Cornell University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-10-18

Total downloads
40 ( #149,959 of 2,242,537 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #43,492 of 2,242,537 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature