Foundations of Physics 39 (5):499-509 (2009)

Authors
Avshalom C. Elitzur
Tel Aviv University
Abstract
Special relativity is based on the apparent contradiction between two postulates, namely, Galilean vs. c-invariance. We show that anomalies ensue by holding the former postulate alone. In order for Galilean invariance to be consistent, it must hold not only for bodies’ motions, but also for the signals and forces they exchange. If the latter ones do not obey the Galilean version of the Velocities Addition Law, invariance is violated. If, however, they do, causal anomalies, information loss and conservation laws’ violations are bound to occur. These anomalies are largely remedied by introducing waves and fields that disobey Galilean invariance. Therefore, from these inconsistencies within classical mechanics, electromagnetism could be predicted before experiment proved its existence. Special relativity, it might be argued, would then follow naturally, either as a resolution of the resulting conflict or as an extrapolation of the path between the theories. We conclude with a review of earlier attempts to base SR on a single postulate, and point out the originality of the present work
Keywords Special relativity  Galilean invariance  Electromagnetism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10701-009-9301-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,873
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Necessity of the Second Postulate in Special Relativity.Alon Drory - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51:57-67.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Galilean Relativity and Galileo's Relativity.Alan Chalmers - 1993 - In S. French & H. Kamminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 189--205.
Classical Mechanics in Galilean Space-Time.Ray E. Artz - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (9-10):679-697.
A Connection Between Minkowski and Galilean Space‐Times in Quantum Mechanics.Douglas Kutach - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):15 – 29.
The Mathematical Basis for Physical Laws.R. Eugene Collins - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (5):743-785.
Conventionalism in Special Relativity.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (7-8):573-583.
Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
41 ( #244,210 of 2,401,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #361,744 of 2,401,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes