Moderate eugenics and human enhancement

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1):3-12 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Though the reputation of eugenics has been tarnished by history, eugenics per se is not necessarily a bad thing. Many advocate a liberal new eugenics—where individuals are free to choose whether or not to employ genetic technologies for reproductive purposes. Though genetic interventions aimed at the prevention of severe genetic disorders may be morally and socially acceptable, reproductive liberty in the context of enhancement may conflict with equality. Enhancement could also have adverse effects on utility. The enhancement debate requires a shift in focus. What the equality and/or utility costs of enhancement will be is an empirical question. Rather than philosophical speculation, more social science research is needed to address it. Philosophers, meanwhile, should address head-on the question of how to strike a balance between liberty, equality, and utility in cases of conflict (in the context of genetics)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics and eugenic enhancement.Michael Selgelid - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):239-261.
Liberalism and eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.
The Moral Significance of the Therapy-Enhancement Distinction in Human Genetics.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):365-377.
Genetic Enhancement and the Biopolitical Horizon of Class Conflict.Wade Roberts - 2010 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 18 (1):27-42.
Imagining human enhancement: Whose future, which rationality?Floris Tomasini - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):497-507.
Should we enhance animals?S. Chan - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):678-683.
Governmentality, Biopower, and the Debate over Genetic Enhancement.L. McWhorter - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (4):409-437.
The silencing of Kierkegaard in Habermas' critique of genetic enhancement.Karin Christiansen - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (2):147-156.
Enhancement and the ethics of development.Allen Buchanan - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (1):pp. 1-34.
Can human genetic enhancement be prohibited?William Gardner - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):65-84.
Francis Galton: and eugenics today.D. J. Galton & C. J. Galton - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (2):99-105.
Egalitarianism and Responsibility in the Genetic Future.Linda Barclay - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (2):119-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
132 (#96,605)

6 months
6 (#133,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Selgelid
Monash University

Citations of this work

Race, Eugenics, and the Holocaust.Jonathan Anomaly - 2022 - In Ira Bedzow & Stacy Gallin (eds.), Bioethics and the Holocaust. Springer. pp. 153-170.
Dehumanization, Disability, and Eugenics.Robert A. Wilson - 2021 - In Maria Kronfeldner (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Dehumanization. New York, NY, USA: pp. 173-186.
Eugenics, Disability, and Bioethics.Robert A. Wilson - 2022 - In Joel Reynolds & Christine Weiseler (eds.), The Disability Bioethics Reader. New York, NY, USA: Routledge. pp. 21-29.
The Ethics of Human Enhancement.Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (4):233-243.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1981 - W.W. Norton and Company.
Health as a theoretical concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.

View all 32 references / Add more references