Monash Bioethics Review 19 (4):9-33 (2000)

Authors
Michael Selgelid
Monash University
Abstract
Many are worried that the Human Genome Project will lead to a revival of eugenics. In this essay I examine the troublesome history of the ‘old eugenics’ which included the Nazi program of ‘Racial Hygiene’ and the sterilization of the ‘feebleminded’ in the United States of America. A ‘new eugenics’, involving prenatal diagnosis and the selective abortion of fetuses likely to develop into severely disabled infants, on the other hand, is claimed by many to be morally acceptable. If this is correct, then eugenics per se might not necessarily be an altogether bad thing. I therefore examine what was wrong with the old eugenics and what is often claimed to be different and better about the new eugenics. I argue that the morally relevant differences between the bad old eugenics and a potentially acceptable new eugenics are not accurately captured by a family of contrasts often thought to distinguish the two. I conclude that, in any case, the worry that the Human Genome Project will lead to a revival of eugenics is a red herring. The important thing is to realize that emerging genetic science and technology confronts both individuals and society as a whole with new kinds of reproductive decisions worthy of careful consideration.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/bf03351241
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ethics and Eugenic Enhancement.Michael Selgelid - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):239-261.
La moralidad de la interrupción del embarazo.Mauricio Correa Casanova - 2014 - Veritas: Revista de Filosofía y Teología 31:115-131.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neugenics: Genetically Informed Reproductive Decision Making.Michael J. Selgelid - 2001 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Ethics and Antimicrobial Resistance.Michael Selgelid (ed.) - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Introduction.Enemark Christian & Selgelid Michael - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (3-4):185-186.
On the Dual Uses of Science and Ethics.Selgelid Michael & Rappert Brian (eds.) - 2013 - Australian National University Press.
From the Guest Editors.Michael J. Selgelid - 2004 - Developing World Bioethics 4 (1):iii–vi.
From the Guest Editors.Michael J. Selgelid - 2004 - Developing World Bioethics 4 (1):iii-vi.
From the Guest Editors.Michael J. Selgelid & Margaret P. Battin - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (4):iii–vii.
Dual‐Use Research.Michael J. Selgelid - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Focus on Infectious Disease.Michael J. Selgelid - 2005 - Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):227-228.
Book Review. [REVIEW]Michael J. Selgelid - 2002 - South African Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):144-146.
An Argument Against Arguments for Enhancement.Michael J. Selgelid - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
The Dual-Use Dilemma-Reply.Michael J. Selgelid - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (5):6-7.
Universal Norms and Conflicting Values.Phd Michael J. Selgelid - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (3):267–273.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-06

Total views
6 ( #1,102,612 of 2,448,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #141,638 of 2,448,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes