Monash Bioethics Review 19 (4):9-33 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Many are worried that the Human Genome Project will lead to a revival of eugenics. In this essay I examine the troublesome history of the ‘old eugenics’ which included the Nazi program of ‘Racial Hygiene’ and the sterilization of the ‘feebleminded’ in the United States of America. A ‘new eugenics’, involving prenatal diagnosis and the selective abortion of fetuses likely to develop into severely disabled infants, on the other hand, is claimed by many to be morally acceptable. If this is correct, then eugenics per se might not necessarily be an altogether bad thing. I therefore examine what was wrong with the old eugenics and what is often claimed to be different and better about the new eugenics. I argue that the morally relevant differences between the bad old eugenics and a potentially acceptable new eugenics are not accurately captured by a family of contrasts often thought to distinguish the two. I conclude that, in any case, the worry that the Human Genome Project will lead to a revival of eugenics is a red herring. The important thing is to realize that emerging genetic science and technology confronts both individuals and society as a whole with new kinds of reproductive decisions worthy of careful consideration.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neugenics: Genetically Informed Reproductive Decision Making.Michael J. Selgelid - 2001 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Ethics and Antimicrobial Resistance.Michael Selgelid (ed.) - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
On the Dual Uses of Science and Ethics.Selgelid Michael & Rappert Brian (eds.) - 2013 - Australian National University Press.
From the guest editors.Michael J. Selgelid - 2004 - Developing World Bioethics 4 (1):iii–vi.
From the Guest Editors.Michael J. Selgelid - 2004 - Developing World Bioethics 4 (1):iii-vi.
From the guest editors.Michael J. Selgelid & Margaret P. Battin - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (4):iii–vii.
Dual‐Use Research.Michael J. Selgelid - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Focus on infectious disease.Michael J. Selgelid - 2005 - Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):227-228.
Book Review. [REVIEW]Michael J. Selgelid - 2002 - South African Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):144-146.
An Argument against Arguments for Enhancement.Michael J. Selgelid - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
The dual-use dilemma-Reply.Michael J. Selgelid - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (5):6-7.
Universal norms and conflicting values.Phd Michael J. Selgelid - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (3):267–273.
A relational approach to saviour siblings?Michael J. Selgelid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (12):924-925.


Added to PP

8 (#988,777)

6 months
1 (#450,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Selgelid
Monash University

Citations of this work

Ethics and eugenic enhancement.Michael Selgelid - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):239-261.
La moralidad de la interrupción del embarazo.Mauricio Correa Casanova - 2014 - Veritas: Revista de Filosofía y Teología 31:115-131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references