Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology

Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):723-737 (2011)

Abstract
The national-level scenarios project NanoFutures focuses on the social, political, economic, and ethical implications of nanotechnology, and is initiated by the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University (CNS-ASU). The project involves novel methods for the development of plausible visions of nanotechnology-enabled futures, elucidates public preferences for various alternatives, and, using such preferences, helps refine future visions for research and outreach. In doing so, the NanoFutures project aims to address a central question: how to deliberate the social implications of an emergent technology whose outcomes are not known. The solution pursued by the NanoFutures project is twofold. First, NanoFutures limits speculation about the technology to plausible visions. This ambition introduces a host of concerns about the limits of prediction, the nature of plausibility, and how to establish plausibility. Second, it subjects these visions to democratic assessment by a range of stakeholders, thus raising methodological questions as to who are relevant stakeholders and how to activate different communities so as to engage the far future. This article makes the dilemmas posed by decisions about such methodological issues transparent and therefore articulates the role of plausibility in anticipatory governance
Keywords Plausibility  Deliberation  Social implications of nanotechnology  Foresight
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9315-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,434
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Editorial Overview.Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication.Maja Horst - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):801-815.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nanotechnology — a New Field of Ethical Inquiry?Armin Grunwald - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):187-201.
Towards the Conscientious Development of Ethical Nanotechnology.Rosalyn W. Berne - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):627-638.
On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy.René Schomberg - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-10-08

Total views
30 ( #300,660 of 2,280,300 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #239,973 of 2,280,300 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature