Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10 (4):735-746 (2019)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Earlier work has demonstrated that attention is indirectly cognitively malleable by processes of self-association – processes by which agents explicitly associate an item with the self. We extend this work by considering the manipulation of attention to both salient and non-salient objects. We demonstrate that self-association impacts attentional processing not only of non-salient objects, but also regarding salient items known to command attention. This result indicates the flexibility and susceptibility of attentional processing to cognitive manipulation.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s13164-018-0430-3 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Aging and Motivated Cognition: The Positivity Effect in Attention and Memory.Mara Mather & Laura L. Carstensen - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (10):496-502.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alerting Enhances Attentional Bias for Salient Stimuli: Evidence From a Global/Local Processing Task.Noam Weinbach & Avishai Henik - 2014 - Cognition 133 (2):414-419.
Visual Search for Change: A Probe Into the Nature of Attentional Processing.R. Rensink - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7:345-376.
Arousal (but Not Valence) Amplifies the Impact of Salience.Matthew R. Sutherland & Mara Mather - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (3):616-622.
Attention and the Evolution of Intentional Communication.Ingar Brinck - 2000 - Pragmatics and Cognition 9 (2):259-277.
Shades of Awareness on the Mechanisms Underlying the Quality of Conscious Representations: A Commentary to Fazekas and Overgaard ().Anna Anzulewicz & Michał Wierzchoń - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (6):2095-2100.
Nonconscious Perception, Conscious Awareness and Attention.Rajendra D. Badgaiyan - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):584-586.
Attentional Bias During Emotional Processing: Evidence From an Emotional Flanker Task Using IAPS.Mario A. Parra, Manuel Guillermo Sánchez, Stella Valencia & Natalia Trujillo - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (2):275-285.
Individual Differences in Visual and Auditory Processing of Emotional Material.Małgorzata Fajkowska & Anna Zagórska - 2015 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 46 (2):174-180.
Drunk, but Not Blind: The Effects of Alcohol Intoxication on Change Blindness.Gregory Jh Colflesh & Jennifer Wiley - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (1):231-236.
What is a Visual Object? Evidence From Target Merging in Multiple Object Tracking.Brian J. Scholla - 2001 - Cognition 80 (1-2):159-177.
The Role of Words and Sounds in Infants' Visual Processing: From Overshadowing to Attentional Tuning.Vladimir M. Sloutsky & Christopher W. Robinson - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (2):342-365.
Visual Processing Capacity and Attentional Control.Richard M. Shiffrin & Gerald T. Gardner - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):72.
Intentional Action Processing Results From Automatic Bottom-Up Attention: An EEG-Investigation Into the Social Relevance Hypothesis Using Hypnosis.Eleonore Neufeld, Elliot C. Brown, Sie-In Lee-Grimm, Albert Newen & Martin Brüne - 2016 - Consciousness and Cognition 42:101-112.
Attentional Processing of Emotional Material in Types of Anxiety and Depression.Małgorzata Fajkowska, Ewa Domaradzka & Agata Wytykowska - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (7):1448-1463.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-01-12
Total views
17 ( #585,486 of 2,403,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,211 of 2,403,714 )
2019-01-12
Total views
17 ( #585,486 of 2,403,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,211 of 2,403,714 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads