Standards of evidence for designed sex differences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):289 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the heart of the debate between social role theorists and evolutionary psychologists is whether natural selection has designed the minds of the sexes differently to some interesting extent. In this commentary I describe the standards of evidence for both the positive and negative claims. In my opinion, Archer has met the standard for designed sex differences in intrasexual conflict

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Differences, games, and pluralism.Roger A. McCain - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):688-689.
Wittgenstein and Realism.Michael Scott - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):170-190.
Gender Differences in Double Standards.Iris Vermeir & Patrick Van Kenhove - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):281 - 295.
Sex, sex differences, and the new polygyny.John Marshall Townsend - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):295-296.
Contextualism and the problem of the external world.Ram Neta - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):1–31.
A Sorry Tail: Ability, Pedagogy and Educational Reform.Susan Hart - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (2):153 - 168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
86 (#192,854)

6 months
14 (#168,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references