Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):70-79 (2022)

Authors
Shamima Lasker
Bangladesh Bioethics Society
Abstract
Humans should come down from their destructive arrogance stool to take the best cognizance of the fact that nature is a sculptural work of God. Their failure to realise this fact has been responsible for their formulation of the secular environmental theories which include; anthropocentrism, zoocentrism, biocentrism, ecocentrism, and the hybrid eco-feminism. Romanced with these theories the Holy Scriptures are also implicated by reading them in the light of one of these theories and considered anthropocentric. As a matter of fact, the best of these secular theories should never be taken to be representing theocentric view of the environment.
Keywords Theocentrism, Anthropocentrism, Zoocentrism, Biocentrism, Ecocentrism, Eco-Feminism, Environmentalism.
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Towards a Multidimensional, Environmentalist Ethic.Alan Carter - 2011 - Environmental Values 20 (3):347-374.
Bioethics in Dilemma of Anthropocentrism and Biocentrism.Haluk Aşar - 2017 - Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi 4 (2):74-86.
The Greening of White Pride.Steven Gimbel - 2004 - Philosophy and Geography 7 (1):123-140.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-04-21

Total views
26 ( #439,185 of 2,507,684 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #34,413 of 2,507,684 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes