Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):653-661 (2013)

Abstract
The new dilemmas and responsibilities which arise in bioethics both because of the unprecedented pace of scientific development and of growing moral pluralism are more and more difficult to grapple with. At the ‘global’ level, the call for the universal nature at least of some fundamental moral values and principles is often being contended as a testament of arrogance, if not directly as a new kind of subtler imperialism. The human rights framework itself, which provided the basis for the most relevant international declarations and documents, is not exempt from the charge. However, the refusal of a top-down conception of the universal as a sort of product for exportation should not be confused with a relativistic landscape, where all the cows can be indifferently black or white. This contribution aims at outlining an approach, which reconciles universalism as enshrined in founding human rights declarations with respect for cultural diversity. In order to do so, two conceptual frameworks are discussed: the ‘tool-kit’ model and the morals/ethics difference. The example of the right to quality health care confirms the argument that striking a balance between cherishing pluralism and defending some fundamental rights and obligations does not amount to an assertion of moral imperialism
Keywords Cultural diversity  Human rights  Pluralism  Traditional medicine  Universalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-013-9495-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
The Concept of Law.Stuart M. Brown - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):250.
Taking Rights Seriously.Alan R. White - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (109):379-380.
Human Dignity and Human Rights as a Common Ground for a Global Bioethics.R. Andorno - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):223-240.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Diversity of Bioethics.Henk ten Have & Bert Gordijn - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):635-637.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Rights, Individualism and Cultural Diversity.Rowan Cruft - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):265-287.
The Non-Modularity of Moral Knowledge.Theresa Waynand Tobin - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:33-50.
The Political Pluralistic Conception of Human Right.Zhen-Rong Gan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:149-154.
Human Rights and Cultural Diversity.William Sweet - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):117-132.
The International Significance of Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):45-69.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
20 ( #524,776 of 2,433,288 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #462,722 of 2,433,288 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes