Human Nature 32 (2):450-469 (2021)
AbstractPrevious research indicates that Euro-American women are more upset by imagining their male partners committing homosexual infidelities than heterosexual ones. The present studies sought to replicate these findings and extend them to two non-Western cultures wherein masculine men frequently engage in sexual interactions with feminine third-gender males. Across six studies in three cultural locales, women were asked to rate their degree of upset when imagining that their partner committed infidelity that was heterosexual in nature, as well as infidelity that was homosexual. In two Canadian undergraduate samples, women reported greater upset at imagining partner infidelity with a female, whereas a community sample of middle-aged women reported equal upset across infidelity types. Samoan women reported substantially less upset at the thought of partner infidelity with a third-gender male than with a female. Istmo Zapotec women reported equal upset toward infidelity with a female or a third-gender male, whereas a second Zapotec sample reported slightly greater upset at the thought of infidelity with a muxe. Results illustrate how cultural contexts moderate the degree to which same-sex infidelity scenarios are upsetting to women.
Similar books and articles
Romantic jealousy in early adulthood and in later life.Todd K. Shackelford, Martin Voracek, David P. Schmitt, David M. Buss, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford & Richard L. Michalski - 2004 - Human Nature 15 (3):283-300.
Why, and to what extent, is sexual infidelity wrong?Natasha McKeever - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):515-537.
Mastering Emotions or Still Losing Control? Seeking Public Engagement with 'Sexual Infidelity' Homicide.Adrian Howe - 2013 - Feminist Legal Studies 21 (2):141-161.
Male Sexual Jealousy: Lost Paternity Opportunities?David J. Buller - 2019 - Psychological Reports 122 (2):575-592.
Upset in response to a Sibling’s partner’s infidelities.Richard L. Michalski, Todd K. Shackelford & Catherine A. Salmon - 2007 - Human Nature 18 (1):74-84.
The Relationship between Adult Occupational Preferences and Childhood Gender Nonconformity among Samoan Women, Men, and Fa’afafine.Scott W. Semenyna & Paul L. Vasey - 2016 - Human Nature 27 (3):283-295.
Partner Status Influences Women’s Interest in the Opposite Sex.Heather Rupp, Giliah R. Librach, Nick C. Feipel, Ellen D. Ketterson, Dale R. Sengelaub & Julia R. Heiman - 2009 - Human Nature 20 (1):93-104.
Estrogens and relationship jealousy.David C. Geary, M. Catherine DeSoto, Mary K. Hoard, Melanie Skaggs Sheldon & M. Lynne Cooper - 2001 - Human Nature 12 (4):299-320.
Distancing as a Gendered Barrier: Understanding Women Scientists’ Gender Practices.Laura A. Rhoton - 2011 - Gender and Society 25 (6):696-716.
Sex Differences in Detecting Sexual Infidelity.Paul W. Andrews, Steven W. Gangestad, Geoffrey F. Miller, Martie G. Haselton, Randy Thornhill & Michael C. Neale - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (4):347-373.
A Substantive Revision to Firth's Ideal Observer Theory.Nancy Rankin - 2020 - Stance 3 (1):55-61.
Undoing the 'Package Picture' of Cultures.Uma Narayan - 2004 - Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 25 (4):1083-1086.
Impiedade Linguística e o Sustento da Moral em Adorno.Francisco Luciano Teixeira Filho - 2018 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74 (2-3):865-878.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Intra- and Intersexual Mate Competition in Two Cultures.Scott W. Semenyna, Francisco R. Gómez Jiménez & Paul L. Vasey - 2022 - Human Nature 33 (2):145-171.