Empiricism in science and ethics

Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (4):449-470 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We elucidate the conditions under which any hypothesis is explanatorily relevant by analyzing several tests of explanatory relevance and explanations based on those tests. A new causal criterion of explanatory relevance is developed and defended. We show how the causal criterion succeeds in establishing, at the very least, a very strong presumption against moral facts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Between Chomskian rationalism and Popperian empiricism.Stephen P. Stich - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):329-47.
What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism?Nicholas Maxwell - 2015 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 3 (2):5-31.
Constructive empiricism and the vices of voluntarism.Paul Dicken - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):189 – 201.
Challenges to empiricism.Harold Morick (ed.) - 1972 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
55 (#284,290)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Moral facts and the problem of justification in ethics.Stefan Sencerz - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):368 – 388.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism.Hartry H. Field - 1980 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
The language of morals.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1952 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.

View all 49 references / Add more references