Personal Goodness and Moral Facts

Journal of Philosophical Research 20:481-498 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peter Railton argues that normative realism is justified because the non-moral goodness of an individual has explanatory uses. After having equated moral rightness with a kind of impersonal social rationality, he argues that rightness, so defined, helps to explain various social phenomena. If he is right, then moral realism would be justified, too. Railton’s argument fails, however, on both counts. Several crucial steps in his reasoning are unsupported and are likely to be false. The explanations he proposes may be dismissed in favor of better explanations that do not use any normative or moral terms. Some of us may share RaiIton’s moral standards. There is no reason, however, to embrace his metaethical position as welI. His arguments do not support either normative or moral facts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personal Goodness and Moral Facts.Stefan Sencerz - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:481-498.
Moral Explanations of Moral Beliefs.Don Loeb - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):193-208.
A Biological Alternative to Moral Explanations.Joseph Millum - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):385-407.
Moral and epistemic open-question arguments.Chris Heathwood - 2009 - Philosophical Books 50 (2):83-98.
Moral and theological realism: The explanatory argument.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):311-329.
Moral Intuitions, Moral Facts, and Justification in Ethics.Stefan S. Sencerz - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
Moral explanations of moral beliefs.Don Loeb - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):193–208.
Goodness and Moral Twin Earth.Christopher Freiman - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (2):445-460.
What Is The Basis of Moral Obligation?H. A. Prichard - 2002 - In Jim MacAdam (ed.), Moral Writings. Clarendon Press.
A Critique of Assimilative Moral Realism.Ken Yasenchuk - 1995 - Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada)
Outline for an Argument for Moral Realism.Lars Bergström - 1981 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 12 (1):215-225.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
13 (#1,063,856)

6 months
6 (#588,245)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Moral facts and the problem of justification in ethics.Stefan Sencerz - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):368 – 388.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references