Wallace, Turner, and Perkins revisited

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20 (3):178-179 (1982)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3758/bf03334808
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,461
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Gainsborough and Turner: The Problem of Stylistic Continuity.Wallace Jackson - 1974 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (4):539-547.
Intensions and Indeterminacy: Reply to Soames, Turner, and Wilson.David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):249-269.
Saunders and Wallace Reply.Simon Saunders & David Wallace - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):315-317.
Turner on Reason and Proving God’s Existence.Bruce Milem - 2007 - Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):79-94.
When Bluff Isn't Enough.Max Wallace - 2013 - The Australian Humanist 109 (109):19.
Pandora's Box Revisited: A Review Article.David H. Richter - 1974 - Critical Inquiry 1 (2):453-478.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #465,283 of 2,286,454 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #321,950 of 2,286,454 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature